Citat:
Germany led the way in 1998, with a record 793 MW of wind schemes going up. This brought the country’s total to an impressive
2875 MW, producing as much electricity as two of the country’s largest coal-fired power stations.
Jest vala, izgleda vrlo impresivno. Sve dok se ne vidi koliko ukupno energije trosi zemlja sa 80+ miliona ljudi ;-)
Pazi ovo:
Electricity - production:
566.9 billion kWh (2004)
Electricity - consumption:
524.6 billion kWh (2004)
http://www.uic.com.au/nip46.htm
Germany's electricity production in 2004 was 610 billion kWh, 6224 kWh per capita. Coal provides 55% of the country's electricity.
The country's 17 operating nuclear power reactors, comprising 20.6% of installed capacity, supply almost one third of the electricity (158.7 TWh in 2006). Many of the units are large (they total 20,339 MWe), and the last came into commercial operation in 1989. Six units are boiling water reactors (BWR), 11 are pressurised water reactors (PWR). All were built by Siemens-KWU. A further PWR has not operated since 1988 because of a licensing dispute.
--
Dakle, 20% kapaciteta nuklearnih elektrana proizvodi 1/3 ukupne energije u Nemackoj - iliti 203 milijarde kWh, da kojim slucajem ukljuce sve, ostalo bi im 50% energije da izvoze - bez i grama uglja :-)
Mislim, vetar je kul - ali cisto sumnjam da ce vetar ikada biti bitniji od 1% ukupno proizvedene energije. Osim toga, energija vetra je vrlo nestabilna, sto je potpuno ubistvo za planiranje elektricne mreze, pa se cesto desava da se zbog vetra moraju praviti
dodatna postrojenja koja ce da kompenzuju svaki nedostatak vetra - jer, kao sto sami znate, struja ne moze da se "spakuje" i sacuva za neki drugi momenat :)
Osim toga, postrojenja koja generisu energiju uz pomoc vetra imaju veliki problem - najvecu kolicinu energije proizvode kada je ona najmanje potrebna (nocu)
Re: Geopatogeno, kosmicko i drugo stetno zracenje
