Navigacija
Lista poslednjih: 16, 32, 64, 128 poruka.

Neko je rekao MSFT?

[es] :: IT pravo i politika razvoja :: Neko je rekao MSFT?

[ Pregleda: 3252 | Odgovora: 0 ] > FB > Twit

Postavi temu Odgovori

Autor

Pretraga teme: Traži
Markiranje Štampanje RSS

Gojko Vujovic
Amsterdam, NL

Administrator
Član broj: 1
Poruke: 13651



+165 Profil

icon Neko je rekao MSFT?10.11.2001. u 00:23 - pre 272 meseci
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/...D148465.DTL&type=printable

State AGs sabotaging Microsoft settlement
Sally C. Pipes
Thursday, November 8, 2001
?2001 San Francisco Chronicle

IT'S DEJA VU all over again: a handful of state attorneys general, California's Bill Lockyer among them, are attempting to sabotage a settlement of the Microsoft antitrust case. Just why the attorneys general are once more bucking efforts by the Justice Department and nine states to move on is anyone's guess. What is clear enough, though, is that it will not serve anyone's interest -- except perhaps, Microsoft's commercial rivals -- to force this case back into the courts.

A year ago February, Thomas Penfield Jackson, the trial court judge, appointed a distinguished jurist, Judge Richard Posner of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago, to mediate a settlement. With draconian penalties looming, Microsoft accepted demands by the Justice Department that included tough, continuing regulation of the company's marketing tactics. But the hard-line state Attorneys general -- notably those from California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa -- vetoed the deal, leading the frustrated mediator to point out in public that the "states do not have the resources to do more than free ride on federal antitrust litigation, complicating its resolution."

Since then, an appellate court has rolled back most of the findings of legal liability that gave the government its leverage and instructed the trial court to create remedies that fit the "drastically altered" circumstances. Under prodding to settle from the newly appointed judge, Colleen Kollar- Kotelly, prosecutors worked out another deal that puts a lid on Microsoft's aggressive behavior -- albeit one less confining than the agreement California Attorney General Lockyer and company so righteously dismissed almost two years ago. A rump group of attorneys general have now declared that they will oppose the proposed settlement when Judge Kollar-Kotelly formally reviews it.

Why are they asking the court to derail the settlement, effectively guaranteeing that the case won't be resolved for years? The state attorneys general claim the high ground as defenders of consumers, but it is hard to see what consumers of software would gain in prolonging this legal agony.

Besides, the California voters who elected Lockyer are investors as well as consumers. The last time the attorneys general vetoed a settlement, the value of Microsoft stock held by the pension funds representing California's public school teachers and state employees fell by a whopping $1.2 billion. While the shock of a setback might not be as large this time around, the last thing investors need in this economic climate is another source of uncertainty.

Continuing to drag out the case is economically irresponsible. Americans have already paid at least $35 million in costs at the federal and state levels for the antitrust enforcement against Microsoft. By its own estimate, the California attorney general's office has already put in 4,422 hours of work into the case, costing taxpayers $1.4 million. That is too much to spend at a time when the state's government is so cash-starved that it has announced that it is raising the sales tax.

Perhaps Lockyer is simply defending California-based companies that are Microsoft's bitterest rivals: Netscape, Oracle and Sun Microsystems.As Judge Posner complained, the state attorneys general "are subject to influence by interest groups that may represent a potential antitrust defendant's competitors."

But, so parochial a stance would be shortsighted. California is the state that depends most on the speedy recovery of high-technology industries. And that recovery surely depends, in part, on letting important American companies such as Microsoft get back to doing what they do best: innovating, not litigating.

Sally C. Pipes is president of Pacific Research Institute, a San Francisco-based public policy think tank.

?2001 San Francisco Chronicle Page A - 27
 
Odgovor na temu

[es] :: IT pravo i politika razvoja :: Neko je rekao MSFT?

[ Pregleda: 3252 | Odgovora: 0 ] > FB > Twit

Postavi temu Odgovori

Navigacija
Lista poslednjih: 16, 32, 64, 128 poruka.