rasizam, homofobija i sovinizam u BG-u?

Izvoljski: Homoseksualnost ne samo da je bolest nego je i totalno neprihvatljivo drustveno ponasanje (kao i huliganizam) i zbog toga ga ne treba promovisati. Zamislimo sada da smo svi homoseksualci. Ovaj nas svet bi izumro i sta bi onda bilo ?

Meni je zanimljivo kad se prica o ljudskim slobodama onda obicno se nacinju samo ono teme koje su vekovima vazile u medjuljudskim odnosima. Pa ako je sloboda zasto onda placam porez, idem u vojsku, postujem zakone ? Zar nije sloboda da covek moze da radi STA GOD HOCE ?

Ako je sloboda zasto onda huligan ne moze da razbije grad ili lopov da opljacka banku ili da i pedofil paradira ? Znaci ili cemo biti normalni ljudi i jasno i glasno razluciti sta je normalno, a sta ne ili ce se svako malo javljati grupe izopacenjaka da bi ispunille svoje hirove ?

Hahaha...bas nalazis "prave" izvore za "razumevanje" ove teme...

Američka psihijatrijska asocijacija (APA) je 1973. uklonila homoseksualnost sa svoje liste „poremećaja“. Dve decenije kasnije APA je uklonila i pedofiliju i sadizam iz svoje klasifikacije „poremećaja“


http://www.pecat.co.rs/2010/10...anje-novog-seksualnog-poretka/

In a fact sheet on pedophilia, the APA calls the behavior "criminal and immoral."

"An adult who engages in sexual activity with a child is performing a criminal and immoral act that never can be considered normal or socially acceptable behavior," the APA said.

Dr. Frederick Berlin, founder of the Sexual Disorders Clinic at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, said people who are sexually attracted to children should learn not to feel ashamed of their condition.

"I have no problem accepting the fact that someone, through no fault of his own, is attracted to children. But certainly, such an individual has a responsibility [...] not to act on it," Berlin said.

"Many of these people need help in not acting on these very intense desires in the same way that a drug addict or alcoholic may need help. Again, we don't for the most part blame someone these days for their alcoholism; we don't see it simply as a moral weakness," he added.

"We do believe that these people have a disease or a disorder, but we also recognize that in having it that it impairs their function, that it causes them suffering that they need to turn for help," Berlin said.

https://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/apa_debates.htm

APA Reverses Diagnostic Change on Pedophilia

Recent changes in the APA's diagnostic manual may have encouraged pedophile advocates.

In an earlier version of the diagnostic manual (DSM-III) , the American Psychiatric Association contended that merely acting upon one's urges toward children was considered sufficient to generate a diagnosis of pedophilia.

But then a few years later, in the DSM-IV, the APA changed its criteria in a way that made room for the psychologically normal type of pedophile. A person who molested children was considered to have a psychiatric disorder only if his actions "caused clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning." In other words, a man who molested children without remorse, and without experiencing significant impairment in his social and work relationships, could be diagnosed--at least theoretically--as a "psychologically normal" type of pedophile. NARTH brought that DSM shift to public attention.

The paper was first published by the American Psychological Association (APA) in July, 1998, in the widely-respected Psychological Bulletin, to little reaction. The first substantial and public reaction was a December criticism by the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, an organization dedicated to the view that homosexuality is a mental illness that can be cured by psychotherapy. In March 1999 talk show host Laura Schlessinger criticized the study as "junk science" and stated that since its conclusions were contrary to conventional wisdom, its findings should never have been released, and she questioned the motives of the authors, asserting the purpose of the study was to allow the homosexual rape of children. Shortly thereafter, the North American Man/Boy Love Association posted an approving review of the study on their website, furthering the impression that the piece was an endorsement of pedophilia.[6]

We met to demand that the American Psychological Association repudiate its APA Bulletin report, "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples." Speakers charged the APA to renounce the study whose authors, Bruce Rind, et al., claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.

After the American Psychiatric Association removed pedophilia as sexual perversion in its 1994 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV, it was only a matter of time until The American Psychological Association would ease us further toward legalizing child sexual abuse. Illinois State Representative Bob Biggins introduced House Resolution 325 damning the APA Rind study that found "sexual relationships between adults and willing children" might be "positive."