Evo sad procitah da je pentagon dao izjavu da je trag u vazduhu najverovatnije od aviona, da je po njihovoj proceni bilo par (cuj par?) aviona u toj "oblasti", i da je najverovatnje da je trag nastao od jednog od njih. Ok - "sve resheno" - nothing to see here, move along

. Mada, nikako da kazu koji je to avion bio na toj visini, sve bez ikakvog broja ili dokaza ili podatka koji se moze proveriti - isto kao kad bih ja rekao da je balon bio u pitanju... Mislim, wtf, koliko je tesko uporediti putanje i visinu par aviona sa snimcima sa zemlje (njihovom orjentacijom) i naci tacno sta je bilo u pitanju. Mada mislim da oni koji trebaju to da znaju u USA, tachno znaju sta je bilo u pitanju (njihovo ili strano), a sve ovo su price za malu decu...
Ja, naravno, cvrsto ostajem pri tvrdnji da je intergalakticki balon sa bakljom zvezdinih navijaca u pitanju.
Evo i misljenja generala koji je radio sa takvim raketama:
Citat:
L.A. contrail a missile launch? Retired general thinks so
...
During the late 1980s I was assigned to NORAD, as a command director initially and later as the assistant director of operations for NORAD. The NORAD operation was located inside the Cheyenne Mountain complex just outside Colorado Springs, Colo. Twenty-four hours a day a team of approximately 150 highly trained individuals, led by a brigadier general, monitored one of the most sophisticated computer systems in the world. This system was fed data from many different sensors that were able to detect missile shots from any point on the globe.
...
In addition, for over 25 years, I flew U.S. Air Force fighters to include the F-106, F-4, F-15, F-16, and commanded an F-15 Squadron and an F-16 Wing. The sole purpose of the F-106 assignment was to maintain an ability to become airborne in minutes to intercept inbound bombers posing a threat to the U.S. mainland. Untold hours were spent studying and being tested on visually identifying an air-to-air threat to include its type and threat potential.
Based on such, I understand very well the difference between an aircraft contrail and a missile launch contrail.
In my opinion, there is absolutely no doubt that what was captured on video off the coast of California was a missile launch, was clearly observed by NORAD, assessed by a four-star general within minutes, and passed to the president immediately. That is the way the system works, and heads fall if there is a failure. This is one of the most important tenets of national defense and its sole purpose of protecting the American people. Even the smallest failure in this system gets intense scrutiny at the highest level.
Now, the question that still must be answered is why NORAD’s muted response was simply that North America was not threatened, and later our government approved the lame excuse that the picture recorded was simply an aircraft leaving a contrail. This decision was made far above the four-star level, and because the system in place demands it, was made by the president himself.
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/...10-11df-bc49-001cc4c002e0.html
[Ovu poruku je menjao a1200 dana 05.01.2011. u 23:08 GMT+1]