Dizu se braca arapi

Emil Ranc: Pazi ovako, iz tvojih postova se dâ zaključiti da ti je Sarkozi veoma mrzak, a kada uz nekog mrskog dodaš atribute, dalo bi se pomisliti kako ih koristiš kako bi pojačao iskazivanje svoje mržnje prema istom: tipa: "ne samo što je Sarkozi, nego je još i Mađar, i ciganin!". Naravno, druga varijanta je kad ima više Sarkozija na koje je moglo da se pomisli, pa si ti morao da naglasiš kako je to onaj "mađarski ciganin Sarkozi" a ne onaj "riđi holanđanin Sarkozi" i sl.

E sad, što se pedera tiče, to je opet tema o homofobiji kojoj ovde nije mesto, jednostavno ne mogu da razumem otvorenu mržnju prema celoj grupaciji ljudi zbog njihovog seksualnog opredeljenja.

yolja624: Nisam analizirao, samo sam te pitao...

Pise u mom profilu koje sam godiste. A ti?

Sta tebe tu zulja? Ne vidim ni jedan jedini razlog da budes "blizi" gadafiju nego sarkoziju. Ni od jednog nemas nikakve koristi. Cak sta vise, gledajuci istoriju, francuzi su nam daleko blizi...

ArsenLupen:Odakle ti ideja da su svi cigani nomadi?

yolja624: Sta hoces da kazes, francuzima trebaju srpski manastiri pa ih otimaju? Ma idi bre...

yolja624: I sta hoces da kazes, ako je jedan francuz bio umjesan u trgovinu organima na KiM, to sad treba da pljujemo na kompletnu francusku?

Nije jos upao... malo leti iznad. A ima odluka UN koja im je dala mandat da lete i intervenisu.

Dobro, i da je tako... dobili su mandat za prvi korak, a ostalo odradjuju prema potrebama na terenu. Nije im prvi put, ali necu plakati kad smaknu gadafija za razliku od nekih od vas!

I ako jesu rusi reagovali STO NISU SPRIJECILI???? NE MOGU? Onda CAOOOOOO!

yolja624:Sta me briga za link... svakako me te stvari ne doticu. Koga jos normalnog moze paliti prica o "ugrozenom srpstvu", "nebeskom narodu", "svetinjama za koje treba ginuti"? Meni je dosta, a i ti bi trebao da odrastes!

yolja624: Sta hoces da kazes, francuzima trebaju srpski manastiri pa ih otimaju? Ma idi bre....

yolja624: Ti si veoma mudar! :) A to sto je taj divni covjek dokazani terorista, nista ti ne pravi problem? Da se radi o covjeku koji postuje norme ponasanja, niko ne bi ni pravio problem oko njega. Ali posto je pravio sve sto je pravio u zadnjih cca 35 godina, nije ni cudo sto je toliko stalo nekima da ga sklone.

yolja624: A eto, neko zna da odabere pobjednicku stranu. Ako ne mozes da ih pobjedis a ti im se pridruzi...
Ili volis da budes sa luzerima?

On NBC's "Meet the Press," Gates was asked, "Is Libya in our vital interest as a country?" He answered, "No, I don't think it's a vital interest for the U.S., but we clearly have interests there, and it's a part of the region which is a vital interest for the U.S." Gates' statement wasn't an entirely convincing rationale for a major military commitment, and moderator David Gregory responded by saying, "I think a lot of people would hear that and say well, that's quite striking -- not in our vital interests and yet we're committing military resources."
At that moment, Clinton jumped in to offer an extended justification for going to war. "Did Libya attack us?" she asked. "No, they did not attack us. Do they have a very critical role in this region and do they neighbor two countries -- you just mentioned one, Egypt, the other Tunisia -- that are going through these extraordinary transformations and cannot afford to be destabilized by conflict on their borders? Yes. Do they have a major influence on what goes on in Europe because of everything from oil to immigration?"
At that point, Clinton suggested that the U.S. went to war to repay NATO allies for support in Afghanistan. "We asked our NATO allies to go into Afghanistan with us ten years ago," she said. "They have been there, and a lot of them have been there despite the fact that they were not attacked. The attack came on us…They stuck with us. When it comes to Libya, we started hearing from the UK, France, Italy, other of our NATO allies…This was in their vital national interest…"
Earlier, Clinton claimed that American intervention in Libya "prevented a great humanitarian disaster." If there had been no intervention, and Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi had "massacred tens of thousands of people," Clinton said, then critics would have asked why the President of the United States didn't stop it. Clinton conceded that it is difficult to prove that such a massacre would have actually occurred.
Gates said nothing further about the justification for war. He spoke more extensively on progress in the war, saying the no-fly zone has been successfully established and "we've also been successful on the humanitarian side."