OK... Mislim da mali Marko nikako nije skontao poentu tog paradoksa već je sve shvatio suviše bukvalno, a novinari se takođe nisu previše proslavili u ovom slučaju...
Pročitajte onaj članak o Marku, skoknite na
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox i pročitajte opet taj članak.
Ukratko:
Citat:
The paradox arises if one takes the position of the traveling twin: from his perspective, his brother on Earth is moving away quickly, and eventually comes close again. So the traveler can regard his brother on Earth to be a "moving clock" which should experience time dilation. Special relativity says that all observers are equivalent, and no particular frame of reference is privileged. Hence, the traveling twin, upon return to Earth, would expect to find his brother to be younger than himself, contrary to that brother's expectations. Which twin is correct?
Citat:
Note: it is wrong to think twin paradoxes are simply due to acceleration effects. One needs no acceleration to achieve a twin paradox in flat spacetime (cf. Brans and Stewart). Thus, a twin paradox situation does not always imply acceleration.
Inače:
Citat:
Another experiment confirmed time dilation by comparing the effects of speed on two atomic clocks, one based on earth, the other aboard a supersonic plane. They were out of sync afterwards: the atomic clock on the plane was slightly behind.
Putuj planeto, super smo se družili
nama je lepo, taman kako smo zaslužili!