Lupetanje ko šta stigne

Hypotheses non fingo

I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not feign hypotheses. For whatever is not deduced from the phenomena must be called a hypothesis; and hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, or based on occult qualities, or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy. In this philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena, and afterwards rendered general by induction.

Isaac Newton (1726) . Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica

Ivan Dimkovic: TL;DR - nalazenje bolje teorije ne da nije lako, nego je teze nego ikad. Praksa, naravno, prati matematicku istinu - pa tako i QM stoji kakva je vec skoro 100 godina.

Very interesting.

Apologies for a naive question from a reader and apologies if it’s a silly question:
Does this work also demonstrate how the *decision* is made?
I’m just a passing bystander, but it seems to me that the work derives probability distributions.
How does the theory explain the actual outcome of an individual photon?
Or does that require multiple universes?
Don

Regarding the similarity to a double slit interference pattern, what I found in my investigation (see my previous comment) is it was solely the result of the sorting algorithm used for the X coordinates of each possible outcome/weight. Ordering by the average X location results in a binomial distribution, but there are still ties to deal with. Applying secondary sorting to those based on the position of the left or rightmost X creates secondary binomial distributions within the main binomial distribution, similar to what Jonathan showed, except without all the spikiness because his example wasn’t consistently sorted in this manner.

You can see the sorting I’m talking about by looking at the sorting of Xs in the output of weights in Jonathan’s double-slit examples. The bottom half is sorted as I stated, but the top half is somewhat out of order, corresponding to the spikes in the tallest curve in the center of the graphs.

Maxime C, I had the same question as you – Why choose this sorting method for encoding the photon positions? My conclusion is that it doesn’t work however. Each additional step run with a large string produces an additional secondary binomial distribution. To get a smooth curve, we’d need to run billions of steps on a large string, but then we we’d also see billions of peaks, which no longer compares well with the expected diffraction pattern.

Matt Kelly - October 4, 2020 at 8:44 am

Very interesting read, but I hope you find time to answers Matt Kelly’s concerns. Not answering undermines the whole edifice of the wolfram physics theory.
David Deene - November 3, 2020 at 4:09 am

Nedeljko
Ne znam zašto bi u jednom trenutku bilo teže nego u drugom.

"If I have seen further, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants"

Ivan Dimkovic: Njutnov rad je druga kategorija, na pocetku nije cak imao ni adekvatan nacin racunanja pa je onako, usput, izmislio jedan koji je postao grana matematike. Kazu, za vreme koje ljudi danas uce sve to u skolama. Treba razmisliti o tome :-)

Ivan Dimkovic:To mu dodje kao srednjevekovni MPAA rejting sistem - "hanging, drawing & quartering" = PG-13, dok je "Female nudity" = X

Nedeljko:
Njutna ne bih uzimao kao moralni uzor, ali hajde.

Sastavio je englesku kraljevsku komisiju, čiji je on bio predsednik, gde su preostala četiri člana bila Englezi (astronom Halej, fizičar Huk i još dva lekara), da presudi da li je diferencijalni, integralni i infinitezimalni račun njegov ili Lajbnicov.

Ivan Dimkovic: Ali treba zamisliti Njutnov problem... imas ideju o ponasanju gravitacije u glavi, ali nemas matematiku dovoljno dobru za to, OK - nikakav problem :-)

Ivan Dimkovic: U svakom slucaju ako neko kategoricki tvrdi da slobodne volje nema je ili neupucen u problem tj. lupeta - ili je genije kakvog ova planeta jos nije videla i samo jos cekamo da objavi dokaz u nekom zurnalu pa da udjemo u novu eru saznanja.