Nekako sam znao da ce ovo da se pomene - daleko od toga da je Njutn moralni uzor, opet - ocigledno je imao granice, teorije nije kvario :)))
E sad izgleda jeste robovao ljudskim manama koje svi imamo u nekoj meri, jeste - vrlo verovatno ne voleo da ga imas za neprijatelja :-)
Nego, a propo ove nase rasprave, dok sam gledao t'Hooft-ov video pripremljen za Nobelovu nagradu, naleteh na:
https://www.wolframphysics.org...-effects-in-the-wolfram-model/
TL;DR - neki klinac na nekom forumu linkuje na Wolframa, ushicen kako su rekonstruisali double-slit eksperiment :-)))))
Wolframova "teorija" je naravno jedna od omiljenih medj' programerskom decom na HN (De Broglie-Bohm je suvise komplikovan valjda) - bas bi bilo lepo da je tacna, mislim celularni automati, determinizam - sta ces bolje u zivotu.
Onda se to polako pretopi u "MORA BITI TACNA", kada neko predje na onu drugu stranu razuma i postane clan kulta.
I tako idu cestitke, ja tebi serdare... i neko dosao da se malo pokaki na zurci:
Komentari malo kasnije:
Citat:
Very interesting.
Apologies for a naive question from a reader and apologies if it’s a silly question:
Does this work also demonstrate how the *decision* is made?
I’m just a passing bystander, but it seems to me that the work derives probability distributions.
How does the theory explain the actual outcome of an individual photon?
Or does that require multiple universes?
Don
BOOM 🙂 Very interesting!
Nesto kasnije:
Citat:
Regarding the similarity to a double slit interference pattern, what I found in my investigation (see my previous comment) is it was solely the result of the sorting algorithm used for the X coordinates of each possible outcome/weight. Ordering by the average X location results in a binomial distribution, but there are still ties to deal with. Applying secondary sorting to those based on the position of the left or rightmost X creates secondary binomial distributions within the main binomial distribution, similar to what Jonathan showed, except without all the spikiness because his example wasn’t consistently sorted in this manner.
You can see the sorting I’m talking about by looking at the sorting of Xs in the output of weights in Jonathan’s double-slit examples. The bottom half is sorted as I stated, but the top half is somewhat out of order, corresponding to the spikes in the tallest curve in the center of the graphs.
Maxime C, I had the same question as you – Why choose this sorting method for encoding the photon positions? My conclusion is that it doesn’t work however. Each additional step run with a large string produces an additional secondary binomial distribution. To get a smooth curve, we’d need to run billions of steps on a large string, but then we we’d also see billions of peaks, which no longer compares well with the expected diffraction pattern.
Matt Kelly - October 4, 2020 at 8:44 am
Sokantno! Zrna pasulja kao ni kapljice nisu fotoni, cak i ako ih nacrtamo kao zamrsene grafove... neverovatno.
Citat:
Very interesting read, but I hope you find time to answers Matt Kelly’s concerns. Not answering undermines the whole edifice of the wolfram physics theory.
David Deene - November 3, 2020 at 4:09 am
"Very interesting", kad sam procitao nisam mogao da se ne nasmejem :)
Sada je "July 8, 2021 at 9:55 pm" ali Stephen Wolfram & Co. nisu nista rekli na ovu temu. Eh.
DigiCortex (ex. SpikeFun) - Cortical Neural Network Simulator:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/1 Videos:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/17 Gallery:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/25
PowerMonkey - Redyce CPU Power Waste and gain performance! -
https://github.com/psyq321/PowerMonkey